Become a Fan

Google Advertising


Our Charities

  • Northamptonshire Air Ambulance
    Provide an emergency medical service for the heart of England including Warwickshire, Northamptonshire and Milton Keynes.
  • Hampshire Air Ambulance
    The Hampshire and Isle of Wight Air Ambulance Charity provides a vital service to the two counties yet relies entirely on voluntary donations.
  • Naomi House Children's Hospice
    They help over 220 families with life limiting conditions and support their families. They are there for the good days, difficult days and last days.

Bloggers & Friends


  • Sally Kettle
    A dear friend of ours. And not a bad photographer either ;-)
  • Chase Jarvis
    An excellent advertising photographer in the US who seems to hold a great deal of the same values and approaches we at Ginkgo have...

« Reuters Beijing Olympics Picture of the Day - Michael Phelps... | Main | BBC Countryfile 2008 photo competition... »

August 14, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e55357ec86883400e553e57f9b8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The 10 best things about Adobe Lightroom 2 - A review...:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

John Esberg

So, why do you use apeture vs. Adobe Lightroom 2.0? I'd like to hear your reasoning and logic on the subject.

Stewart

One of the primary reasons we use Aperture is, because we can, as we are Apple based and it is a piece of software not available to PC users.

But the most important reasons are much more fundamental from a professional workflow point of view. As I am still to have a good play with Lightroom 2, the key decision makers were based on the previous version vs Aperture 2.

One key issue we had with Lightroom was its preview renditions of much of our studio based work when wirelessly tethered - To be blunt, it was utterly awful and with art directors in the room with us it was almost embarrassing at how bad it was (the specific decider shoot was a black set with a great deal of tonality in the dark areas going on - All we got was some pixelated mush), whereas Aperture rendered the previews perfectly, so we could see exactly what we were getting and could therefore adjust lighting shot by shot knowing that what we were seeing on screen was what we were going to get. So in essence, reliability of image representation.

We also find the workflow much better with our setups, both in the studio and on location and the ability to manage projects as single entities into a central repository and also to deligate projects from that repository totally invaluable.

Also the image tuning abilities of Aperture 2, for us, are a league above Lightroom 1 and the more we use it, the more it simply astounds us at what it can do and how well it can do it. Plus the way it works with the operating system and Automator actions in OS X suits the way we work with multiple camera systems. Particularly its support for Hasselblad RAW files.

Now, when I started using Aperture 1, I have to be honest, I didn’t like it at all over Lightroom, It was slower, the golden ratio guides were not in it and at first it looked overly complicated and that it was going to be a real pain to use - so we didn’t use it and did use Lightroom.

Then Aperture 2 came along with its new API architecture and workflows which had actually been created after talking to lots of photographers - and it showed. Within a few days of playing with it we were hooked and now use it as our primary environment.

Having said all of that - I’ll let you in to a little secret - We use both...

Lightroom is great for the output of multiple style proofs really quickly, especially for social portrait sessions and the ease of applying pre-created styles instantly for their input and review is great.

So what we generally do, is use Aperture 2 for our commercial work and Lightroom 1 for our social photographic work.

If I were asked by a non-professional which package they should probably choose, even without having had a real good play with Lightroom 2, I’d still recommend it over Aperture 2 and the reason is simple. It’s a much simpler package to learn and use. The presets are great and the issues we faced are unlikely to be encountered by the vast majority of non-professionals.

My finishing analogy (which I’ll probably get slated for) would be if Photoshop Elements were Lightroom, then Photoshop CS3 Extended would be Aperture 2. So only get it if you’re really going to use what it can do for you.

JENNABooth

Do you know that it's high time to receive the loan, which will make your dreams come true.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    October 2011

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
                1
    2 3 4 5 6 7 8
    9 10 11 12 13 14 15
    16 17 18 19 20 21 22
    23 24 25 26 27 28 29
    30 31          

    SPONSORS

    • Ted Baker
    • John Lewis Partnership PLC
    • LEGO Brand Retail
    • Jigsaw
    • Goldsmiths Ltd.
    • Goldsmiths Ltd.
    • LEGO Brand Retail
    • The Savile Row Company